LCAP Scripps Ranch Cluster Feedback

SDUSD is requesting feedback from the Scripps Ranch community on the 2016-17 Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) document. Below is some information to assist with SR Cluster participation.

Email with the outreach plans:
LCAP-Outreach-Email-04-21-16

Voice of Scripps Ranch response to Goal 5 (Parent and Community engagement):
LCAP-Goal 5-response-05-13-16

LCAP working draft document:
2016-17 LCAP Working Drafty-Draft for Clusters and Stakeholders

Kids and Neighborhoods First!

The school district proposal violates 2 sections of the Miramar Ranch North Community Plan

Section 6.3 of MRN CP states:
“In building and site design, all commercial development should be compatible with surrounding land uses in height and bulk.”

A three and four story apartment/commercial/district use complex is one third to twice the height of adjacent commercial and retail structures.

Section 11.4 of MRN CP states:

“Long, narrow structures and tall building blocks are inappropriate to the canyon setting.”

The canyon setting refers to the land area along Scripps Poway Parkway. The proposed 264 apartment project is located at the corner of Scripps Poway Parkway and Spring Canyon Road.

Elected officials have requested reconsideration and/or opposition to the 264 apartment project

City Council Member Mark Kersey
Council Member Mark Kersey Letter to SDUSD

State Assembly Member Brian Maienschein
MaienscheinRequesttoPostpone-01-05-15

County Supervisor Dave Roberts
Supervisor Dave Roberts Letter to SDUSD Board Item H1 1.26.16

School Board Member Kevin Beiser
Statement-School-Board-Trustee-Kevin-Beiser

“United we stand, divided we fall”

SDUSD Board document (11-13-2001) states requirement of public support and engagement

The SDUSD Executive Summary for Joint Use of the Ellen Browning Scripps Elementary school parking lot and community farmers market back in November 2001 is posted below along with the CA Educational Code sections 17527 – 17535.

The Public Support & Engagement section state:

The requirement of the Education Code for the Board of Education to ensure that any use of school district property under joint-use agreement does not “unduly disrupt the residents in the surrounding neighborhood.”

SDUSD-ExecutiveSummary-11-13-2001

CA-EdCode-sections-17527-17535

Scripps Ranch Schools Committee visits the Qualcomm Thinkabit Lab – 03/16/16

Thank you EBS Principle Liz Sloan for scheduling a tour at the Qualcomm Thinkabit lab so we can experience the district’s STEAM investment for our students.

Qualcomm Thinkabit Lab Overview
QCOM-ThinkabitLab-Ed-Program-6-8th

Ardunio Kit – used to make robo craft
ArduinoKits

Tour Guide states that a Thinkabit Lab can be created in any empty classroom or building and is ideal for placement at school sites.

Tour Photos
IMG_1393-thinkabit
IMG_1391-thinkabit
IMG_1390-thinkabit
IMG_1384-thinkabit
IMG_1383-thinkabit

Scripps Mesa Conference Center (SMCC) Land Deed

Section 7 of the Addendum to Grant Deed/Exhibit “A” states:
Except as stated herein, Grantee and each Successive Owner, during its ownership of any portion of the Scripps Site will be bound hereby for the benefit of Grantor and the Benefitted Land; provided however, the benefits of these provisions pursuant to California CIVIL CODE Section 1468 shall not accrue to subsequent owners of the Benefitted Land unless Grantor expressly assigns such benefits by means of a recorded instrument.

Grantor = Miramar Ranch North (the “Benefitted Land”)
Grantee = San Diego Unified School District

1999-June-30-SDUSD-SMCC-Grant-Deed

Grantor provided design guidelines (terminated 12/31/2010) for the property site and requested:

Grantor desires that the design of the school be compatible with the surrounding community. Grantor’s representative shall be invited to and included in the design process. Conceptual, schematic and design development plans shall be submitted to the Grantor for review and comment. School District shall consider Grantor’s comments during the design process. In order to address Grantor’s concerns about design of the school the following guidelines are required: Landscape/Screening, Fencing, Building Build and Scale, Color and Materials, Roof Mounted Equipment Screening.

SDUSD-SMCC-Grant-Deed-Exhibit-1-attachment

Traffic reports from Sycamore-Penasquitos 230kV Transmission Line final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

The Average Daily Trip (ADT) count for the SPP segment is 48,000 vehicles.
SycPen-FEIR-Appendix_M-ADT

The Level of Service (LOS) for SPP segment is E-F.
SycPen-FEIR-Appendix_M-volume

The transit in the vicinity of SPP segment is greater than 2 miles.
SycPen_FEIR_Vol_III_4-Transit in the vicintiy

SDG&E Sycamore-Penaswuitos 230 kV Transmission Line Project Final EIR – See Volume III: 4.7 Transportation and Traffic

Traffic Report from Watermark Project final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

The Watermark Project is expected to generate approx. 21,000 daily driveway trips and 18,000 daily cumulative trips not including the MedImpact buildings.

The levels of service (LOS) now/existing and with the pending Watermark Project along SPP are:
(I-15 Ramps – Scripps Highland) => existing = E, with Watermark = F
(Scripps Highland – Scripps Summit) => existing = C, with Watermark = E
(Scripps Summit – Spring Canyon) => existing = C, with Watermark = C
(Spring Canyon – Scripps Creek) => existing = E, with Watermark = F
(Scripps Creek – Cypress Canyon) => existing = E, with Watermark = E
(Cypress Canyon – Anqelique) => existing = D, with Watermark = E

F – Appendix C – Traffic Impact Analysis for Watermark